Sunday, November 5, 2017

WEEK 9: MAINSTREAMING ESL WITHOUT PULL OUT

Mainstreaming ESL students with pull-out classes or without pull-out classes?

  I tend to favor mainstreamng ESL students with pull out classes because it allows for the student to work in a smaller setting with a qualified teacher who has knowledge of working with students of this population. An ESL teacher is most likely to increase the student's chances of success with the second language.  They are able to implement strategies to meet the unique needs of these students.  In addition, the students get the opportunity to practice and develop the oral and grammar skills needed to become proficient in the new language.
      Whereas, if you stick a student in a mainstream class with a less qualified teacher who lacks the training to work with this population of students, it takes longer for this student to learn the new language.  The only way I see this working is if the classroom teacher is in constant communication with the ESL teacher and they collaborate on lesson plans and strategies for the student.  I believe that when classroom teachers build that solid back and forth support with the ESL teacher, it improves the ELLs chances of becoming proficient in the new language.

WEEK 8: BILINGUAL EDUCATION IN SOUTH AFRICA

 
                                  BILINGUAL EDUCATION IN SOUTH AFRICA

   The history of bilingual education in South Africa has been a point of contention amongst its' people since the time of the apartheid.  Therefore, it is important to recount the political and social climate of this country during the apartheid.  During the apartheid of 1948, South Africa was ruled by white minority and racial discrimination was institutionalized.  Only two languages ( Afrikaans and English) were recognized as the official languages of South Africa.  School instruction was carried out in English for White South Africans and black minorities were taught in Afrikaans.  It was believed that this educational structure sought to marginalized black minorities and keep them from learning English, the international language of success and social mobility.  Black minorities believed that instructing them in Afrikaans (the rural dialect) was all part of a greater conspiracy to keep blacks in poverty and minimizing their access to English, which was considered the language of power.
     When South Africa became a democratic country in 1994, the government changed the two-language policy that favored white minority.  It passed language policy laws that recognized 11 official languages in South Africa: English, Afrikaans, Isizulu, Sesotho, Sepedi, Isixhosa, Setswana, Isinedebele, Xitsonga, Siswati and Tshivenda.  The premise of this law was to promote multilingualism and diversity in South Africa.  According to the language in Education policy of 1997, parents were given the rights to choose the language their children would be taught in.  In addition, the schools were obligated to promote multilingualism.  In lieu of this law, the department of Education promoted additive bilingualism and the use of a student's native language as the language of teaching and learning in the early grades.
     Despite these laws, schools have not had success with their bilingual programs.  The majority of parents are not on board with bilingual education and have chosen not to have their students instructed in their native language.  They believe that instruction in English from early as possible is the best way to for their children to become English proficient.  They do not trust the school system and believe that teaching students in their native tongue will only lessen their chances of a better life.  They choose English as the language of learning and teaching.  Yet, the academic performance of these students have been less than favorable.  These students are failing to develop their literacy skills.  Linguists and educators have tried to convince these parents (to no avail) of the benefits of a bilingual education in acquiring the new language.  Using studies to demonstrate how students who are literate in their native tongue have an easier time becoming proficient in the target language.  Despite these findings, parents continue to frown upon bilingual education, opting to place their children in English only classes.